Who are the High, Low, and Middle?

The Middle are not the "middle class". Understanding power and introducing the PHvN and GHvR distinction.

There are two ways to frame the question of who the High, Low, and Middle are: genotypically and phenotypically. In genotypic terms, the High and Middle are rivals; this means both are composed of natural elites. The Low are the Hammer, composed of natural followers.

This post will make you understand Roger Waters’ 1979 album “The Wall.”

The unacquainted frequently get this mixed up and claim that the middle class is the Middle. Example:

The middle class is neither a power center nor is it a direct “threat.” We know this because the middle class is composed of natural followers; it is the Hammer which is used by natural elites to wage war on their elite rivals. The real problem is that it is a Trumpist Hammer because it isn’t poor enough to be bribed with handouts. Consequently, grinding down the middle class is an HLvM attack where the shitlib elite is the High, the Trumpist elite are the Middle, and the middle class are the Low/Hammers attempting to be seized from the Middle (via the necessary intermediate action of the High’s own Hammer, democratic voters and the State and corporate cogs which are sent to do the grinding).

All power is a fight over Hammers, and the HLvM mechanism is so revealing because it aptly describes this fight. The H and the M are always elite factions; one is H when they have the upper hand, i.e. State power, and can pick off Hammers from M via their own usage of the L.

We may now consider the phenotypic definition of High, Low, and Middle. The High are the governing elite, the Middle are the non-governing elite, and the Low are the non-elite, all in economic (i.e. phenotypic terms). This is distinct from the genetic view because, due to imperfect meritocracy, some Natural Elites may be economically Low. Due to their lack of power, this sits them out of the game and reduces them to practical equality with Natural Followers. Unlike Natural Followers, however, they have elite potential; if given the appropriate resources, they have the capacity to help administer an elite.

This is possible because of power inertia. A subset of Natural Elite with a large army of Natural Followers can oppress the rest of the Natural Elite class, reducing them to equality. This is the general condition throughout history; from the point of view of the oppressed Natural Elite, the law of the State really has two purposes: to protect Hammer property and to preserve Power Inertia. Egalitarian anti-violence laws are examples of the former while corporate diversity laws are examples of the latter. Only God’s law has any claim to morality. Put another way, any deviation from God’s law in the law of the State is simply to preserve the power of the governing elite, a.k.a. the ruling class, a.k.a. the Patriciate.

I call it the Patriciate because it is clear that the current ruling class function much like the Ancient Roman Patriciate; it is an Inner Party, a society within society, a ruling class which one must be accepted into in order to not face the might weight of their power inertia, their accumulation of Hammers. Specifically it appears to be a group of less than 6000 people who control the top 500 corporations, including finance and the media, and the State. If you are not invited in by this Patriciate, then you are no more than a plebian, you are on the outs from most resources and deals and will struggle to truly become elite no matter your personal merit. Mike Lindell is an example of a true M, a rich plebian who is not accepted by the Patriciate. Ron Unz is another.

Network analysis found in Who Rules America? points to this as well as anecdotes from Ted Turner’s autobiography. In order to receive good deals and make CNN go global, Turner had to cow-tow to Patriciate members including bankers, finance capitalists, and Bill Gates. Consequently he went from a conservative to a globalist crypto-commie. If he had not cucked in order to be invited in, CNN would be about like the Unz Review, or maybe like Fox News, depending on the degree of his dissidence. Even Fox was not enough for Turner, who poo-poos Murdoch and his failure to globalize due to his low-status position in his book; he was more interested in becoming like the New York Times. Read between the lines:

I was discouraged by the NBC discussions but I didn’t think that General Electric would want to own that network forever and thought we might have discussions with them again sometime down the road (which, in fact, we did). In any event, striking out with ABC and NBC left me to consider CBS. I should point out here that by the mid-1990s, the Fox network was well established as a fourth broadcast network. But Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation owned them, and while I knew he had coveted CNN for years, Murdoch was not someone with whom I wanted to do business. Seeing the way he used his newspapers to advance his personal political agenda really bothered me. I certainly encouraged our networks to air programming about issues I considered important, like the environment and overpopulation, but Murdoch specifically supported or tore down individual political candidates through his publications, particularly in Europe. We had worked very hard to establish CNN as an impartial outlet with the highest journalistic standards and doing a deal with him would jeopardize everything we’d built.

My conversations at CBS were with (((Larry Tisch))), the billionaire financier who had made his fortune in a wide range of businesses including hotels, tobacco, and insurance. With no background in media, he was in the network business to get a financial return and it looked like he might be willing to sell CBS for about $5 billion. As we analyzed a valuation for CBS, we also entered discussions with King World about acquiring them. The company was founded and run by the King brothers—Roger and Michael—and I knew them from back in the ’70s when they sold me rerun rights for The Little Rascals on Channel 17. When they started out, The Little Rascals was about the only property they had but with hits like Jeopardy!, Wheel of Fortune, and Oprah, they had grown King World into the most successful syndication company in television. The King brothers were great guys—fun-loving entrepreneurs—and we liked the idea of being part of the same company. They would sell to us in a merger for about $1 billion. Their company was generating tremendous cash flow and I hoped to use those resources to help finance a bigger deal with a network. We were also in some interesting discussions with Bill Gates of Microsoft.

There was a lot to be said for a deal with Microsoft. They had just invested a billion dollars in Comcast and now they were willing to invest a billion in Turner. We could put that cash to good use and in the meantime, we’d jump-start our online business and take a lead against our competitors. With Gates’s billion and the cash that King World and our own companies were generating, we could go after CBS with $2 billion in cash and $3 billion from (((the banks))).

Call Me Ted pg. 260

Look at how much of a club it is! What exactly would have been the fate of CNN if Ted Turner had spoken openly about (((Tisch and Banker))) Power? Not enough for Ted Turner, that’s for sure:

I made my first trip to the Soviet Union early in 1984. I wanted CNN to become a global business and after my Cuba trip, I was hopeful that we could do business in the Soviet Union. When the driver who picked up our group at the Moscow airport drove us by a beautiful new facility, he explained, sadly, that it had been built specifically for the 1980 Olympics, the Games that had been boycotted by the United States in protest of the Soviet Union’s war in Afghanistan. Throughout our visit it seemed like everywhere we went there was another reminder of those Olympics and the more I saw, the sadder I was that our athletes had not been able to participate. Adding to my disappointment was the fact that the Soviets were thinking about retaliating by staying home during the 1984 Olympics later that summer in Los Angeles.

Turner consequently became a huge globalist, starting a bunch of NGOs that did typical globalist neoliberal NGO crap.

At no point was any of this “democratic” or influenced by the “people.” It’s all globalist greed + needing to appeal to unaccountable Jewish money. I have already shown quantitatively that, based on population statistics, society is always going to be this centralized and there is nothing you can do to change it except eugenics. Our only realistic short term goal can be to seize the State and use it to crush hedonistic WASP and J power inertia and to then use our gained power inertia to exclude anti-whites from the Patriciate in the same way they exclude pro-whites now. This can only be done by gaining enough Hammers to make all of the Js want to fly to Israel and to make all of the hedonist gentile defectors like Ted Turner see that it is more profitable to be pro-white than anti-white.

All of this is to say that there is an eternal HLvM mechanism which we may distinguish from situational manifestations: the Patriciate-Hammers vs. Non-governing elite mechanism (PHvN). This is the mechanism by which the Patriciate excludes certain types of natural elites from its ranks. This describes the basic structure of every society.

When rivals become formidable, or when a counter-elite attacks the Patriciate, we have a slightly different phenomenon: the Governing-elite + Hammers vs. Rival elite (GHvR) mechanism. The basic constitution of some society at some moment is described by the continuous application of PBvN; the movements in and out of the Patriciate, and the fights among the Patriciate or between it and a counter-Patriciate are described by the GBvR mechanism. The Democrats attacking Trump and his voter base (white middle class) is an example of GBvR; Trump attacking democrats and their voter base is also GBvR; the fact that Ron Unz and countless other unheard of is excluded from the Patriciate is PBvN.