The more we find out about genes/evolution thereof (and possibly epigenetics), the more ideas like this and The Spiteful Genetic Mutant Hypothesis will gain validity I suspect.
The Leftists TEAR DOWN what the Rightists BUILT UP. They, whoever plays at being in charge, just sets the context to show whats acceptable and let the people then fill it all in with their own desires. If they want to grow a group of people they get all prissy and religious about it pretending "every sperm is sacred". When they want to shrink the group they enable homosexuality and all forms of sexual deviance which has the effect of shrinking the group. That they Dress both angles up in anything and everything to keep the average person from stripping it all back to the bare basics that show CLEAR understanding, is what keeps the THEY as THEY.
And these cycles repeat over and over and over again throughout time. The ones who lag or lead the changes in these contexts are the ones who are seen as the precedence setters if before or dullard laggards if still indulging after the changes have been wrought.
Brilliant article. I’d love to read an expanded version of your last paragraph that discusses interventions. In particular, what would a successful intervention look like within the confines of a democratic multi-racial system? How would it be passed into law? Or would it rely on non-government actors?
I hate Communism, but this is pseudoscientific gobbledygook. Correlation ( if it actually exists) is not causation. What’s next, phrenology, Aryan mythology? Facial feature “analysis” is not DNA analysis. Sorry, everybody is a mutt at this point, like it or not. You’ll have to base your next empire on something else. Maybe a Jiffy Lube Empire of half baked diphthongs. And a better question might be, should we not fund a better basis for interacting than racial selection? How about merit and rule of law? You know like kind of the American ideal? How about we stop acting like monkeys tossing shit at each other and treat one another with some modicum of decency? Just a thought. Another thought: technology changes the playing field. Just like a machine gunner is more valuable than fifty centurions with spears. Being the most beautiful, strongest monkey won’t get it done. Having a huge population won’t necessarily get it done. The past is prologue. It isn’t the entire answer.
Facial symmetry is a very good way to measure mutational load. Humans can identify minute asymetry because this instinct has been selected for before humans existed.
General mutational load is literally dysgenics which is associated with leftism.
Leftists basically have frontemporal dementia. Something like 80% of genes are expressed in the brain, thus if your face is fucked there is a good chance your brain chemistry may be much significantly different.
Uh... no. By illustration, I’m a plastic surgeon. I look at faces and interact with people all day long. It’s gobbledygook. Everybody has a degree of facial asymmetry. A lot of very obviously attractive people have emotional issues. Conversely, many people who are less facially symmetrical do not. If somebody is mentally ill or has neurological issues, you can’t usually tell by looking at their face. It’s an oversimplification. I do think in the other hand that a lot of Leftists have emotional issues, although they aren’t demented by any medical standard. And they may have emotional issues because of environmental and/or genetic reasons, but that’s true for extremists everywhere. This idea doesn’t hold water.
Well, it was led here by our admittedly gay, corrupt elites.
I agree we’re all mixed in, and this is a mishmash, then again it’s political. Seems to be right wing socialism, we’ll redistribute wealth to the conservatives to get the bitchez so we can win wars again... howsa about we win dah wars (seriously, wars not optional now) and then divide up the booty including that phat booty girlz ? > including you cat lady above, don’t worry I got your message. 😉
So we will have to fight the Rus/Viking bred on the Don River wilst rotting from within. Just look at the curent US cabinet members. Technology won't save us.
Possibly. I am speculating here but wouldnt rightwingers also have a good amount of spiteful mutants indicated by their following of anti-mainstream ideas?
Or maybe not at all because right wing tendencies are very much primordial/evolutionarily adapted, thus significant mutational load usually results in some form of leftism.
You guys are some very small folks. Do you actually understand how genetics works, much less how epigenetics works? I know it’s your field, but so you actually understand it? Can you synthesize anything novel, or are you only capable of restating over and over and over what you believe, and because you believe it, well of course you’re right. Do you understand patterns? How to find real signal amidst noise? Keep turning towards rarefaction you self-declared valiant and valid students of history, sociology and biology as the drumbeat of all sense becomes fainter yet the desperation buzzing in your ears only builds as you must have the now nearly deaf hear your voice and believe your lighter than air prognostications. Please stop mashing puzzle pieces of social science together with all of biology and chemistry. You’ve created some terrible nonsensical goop. None of it palatable to those of us who don’t enjoy the smell of your feeble farts. Thankfully the air is so thin here.
The cry of the midwit wordcel. Notice in the first sentence you can tell it's a woman by the attempted height/size shaming, classic female tactic. You are way out of your depth, sweetie.
I didn't notice that but I did think it was a woman because it features the classic insult spew pattern, she just keeps going on and on about how we're bad at pattern matching or whatever, completely made up and mostly irrelevant which is how women tend to argue. They just generate random orthogonal insulting things to throw at you. But yes the dimmer ones tend to land on "incel", "short", "no money", "small penis", even when they are arguing with someone over the internet for which none of these are true.
We Bronskimaxxing out here.
Did they not do the experiment - with mice? Multiple generations living in a Mouse Paradise ("wealthy"), and the mice turned effeminate, gay, and lazy
I Would assume that embroyo selection/repro-Tec+ a strong state would be able to effectively remove leftism from existence within a 3 generations
Inşallah
The more we find out about genes/evolution thereof (and possibly epigenetics), the more ideas like this and The Spiteful Genetic Mutant Hypothesis will gain validity I suspect.
Its not as complicated as people want to make it.
The Leftists TEAR DOWN what the Rightists BUILT UP. They, whoever plays at being in charge, just sets the context to show whats acceptable and let the people then fill it all in with their own desires. If they want to grow a group of people they get all prissy and religious about it pretending "every sperm is sacred". When they want to shrink the group they enable homosexuality and all forms of sexual deviance which has the effect of shrinking the group. That they Dress both angles up in anything and everything to keep the average person from stripping it all back to the bare basics that show CLEAR understanding, is what keeps the THEY as THEY.
And these cycles repeat over and over and over again throughout time. The ones who lag or lead the changes in these contexts are the ones who are seen as the precedence setters if before or dullard laggards if still indulging after the changes have been wrought.
Brilliant article. I’d love to read an expanded version of your last paragraph that discusses interventions. In particular, what would a successful intervention look like within the confines of a democratic multi-racial system? How would it be passed into law? Or would it rely on non-government actors?
It would likely require some kind of non-democratic government.
Once we win the war, all us conservatives will be on welfare plus Pater Familas and the women our slaves.
TBH I like everything but the welfare part ...
Very beautiful article. Cool. But it's so over because eugenics can never be mainstream.
I’m not sure at all Eugenics is a good idea.
I’m certain beyond doubt the absolute worst people would be in charge of Eugenics, because it already happened.
I can predict with confidence we’d get a conservative case for Eugenically eliminating conservative voters...
We won’t get 10 years of peace from welfare to conservatives, you get peace the way it’s always been gotten; Victory in War.
I hate Communism, but this is pseudoscientific gobbledygook. Correlation ( if it actually exists) is not causation. What’s next, phrenology, Aryan mythology? Facial feature “analysis” is not DNA analysis. Sorry, everybody is a mutt at this point, like it or not. You’ll have to base your next empire on something else. Maybe a Jiffy Lube Empire of half baked diphthongs. And a better question might be, should we not fund a better basis for interacting than racial selection? How about merit and rule of law? You know like kind of the American ideal? How about we stop acting like monkeys tossing shit at each other and treat one another with some modicum of decency? Just a thought. Another thought: technology changes the playing field. Just like a machine gunner is more valuable than fifty centurions with spears. Being the most beautiful, strongest monkey won’t get it done. Having a huge population won’t necessarily get it done. The past is prologue. It isn’t the entire answer.
Facial symmetry is a very good way to measure mutational load. Humans can identify minute asymetry because this instinct has been selected for before humans existed.
General mutational load is literally dysgenics which is associated with leftism.
Leftists basically have frontemporal dementia. Something like 80% of genes are expressed in the brain, thus if your face is fucked there is a good chance your brain chemistry may be much significantly different.
Uh... no. By illustration, I’m a plastic surgeon. I look at faces and interact with people all day long. It’s gobbledygook. Everybody has a degree of facial asymmetry. A lot of very obviously attractive people have emotional issues. Conversely, many people who are less facially symmetrical do not. If somebody is mentally ill or has neurological issues, you can’t usually tell by looking at their face. It’s an oversimplification. I do think in the other hand that a lot of Leftists have emotional issues, although they aren’t demented by any medical standard. And they may have emotional issues because of environmental and/or genetic reasons, but that’s true for extremists everywhere. This idea doesn’t hold water.
I’m for accepting war and winning as step one.
Accepting.
Not seeking, it found us.
Well, it was led here by our admittedly gay, corrupt elites.
I agree we’re all mixed in, and this is a mishmash, then again it’s political. Seems to be right wing socialism, we’ll redistribute wealth to the conservatives to get the bitchez so we can win wars again... howsa about we win dah wars (seriously, wars not optional now) and then divide up the booty including that phat booty girlz ? > including you cat lady above, don’t worry I got your message. 😉
I even like cats.
They catch vermin.
So we will have to fight the Rus/Viking bred on the Don River wilst rotting from within. Just look at the curent US cabinet members. Technology won't save us.
My father is a hard conservative person he even have whitenat leans and he have me with 33 years old, the mutational load reached me or I had escaped?
Possibly. I am speculating here but wouldnt rightwingers also have a good amount of spiteful mutants indicated by their following of anti-mainstream ideas?
Or maybe not at all because right wing tendencies are very much primordial/evolutionarily adapted, thus significant mutational load usually results in some form of leftism.
@big bronski are we om the same page?
Thank you for your work.
“appropriate genetic hygiene practices”
Or War, as Wars are perhaps we should win?
Or die. By the rules of this article.
Hmm maybe christianity was also mutational load according to bronskian theory?
https://biblehub.com/galatians/3-28.htm
You guys are some very small folks. Do you actually understand how genetics works, much less how epigenetics works? I know it’s your field, but so you actually understand it? Can you synthesize anything novel, or are you only capable of restating over and over and over what you believe, and because you believe it, well of course you’re right. Do you understand patterns? How to find real signal amidst noise? Keep turning towards rarefaction you self-declared valiant and valid students of history, sociology and biology as the drumbeat of all sense becomes fainter yet the desperation buzzing in your ears only builds as you must have the now nearly deaf hear your voice and believe your lighter than air prognostications. Please stop mashing puzzle pieces of social science together with all of biology and chemistry. You’ve created some terrible nonsensical goop. None of it palatable to those of us who don’t enjoy the smell of your feeble farts. Thankfully the air is so thin here.
The cry of the midwit wordcel. Notice in the first sentence you can tell it's a woman by the attempted height/size shaming, classic female tactic. You are way out of your depth, sweetie.
I didn't notice that but I did think it was a woman because it features the classic insult spew pattern, she just keeps going on and on about how we're bad at pattern matching or whatever, completely made up and mostly irrelevant which is how women tend to argue. They just generate random orthogonal insulting things to throw at you. But yes the dimmer ones tend to land on "incel", "short", "no money", "small penis", even when they are arguing with someone over the internet for which none of these are true.
I doth thinkest that thou art being mean to thine fair blossom. She is and are smart for true! Checkest thine white privilege, cracka!
>The cry of midwit wordcel
You should read more about hbd and pyschometric instead of embrass yourself.
《Overall, it seems vocabulary is the single best way to measure intelligence in terms of g-loading. 》
https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2023/05/which-test-has-the-highest-g-loading/
Are you joking? yapping is all she did, it was incoherent.
She didnt even format correctly🤢🤢🤮
Your cats will eat your body after you die alone in your house, surrounded by pills and wine bottles.