How do you explain then how people will change their minds on issues, and how few are just born far-right and before then would have held left-wing or libertarian views?
A comment from someone who has nothing to do with genetic beyond high school textbook.
Although I understand that you are right about genetics there is some clarification required.
From what I understood. Is it possible that you are reducing an argument of incentive structure to one of genetics. Given Moldbug and Dawkins are wrong, yet Democracy the god that Failed by Hans-Herman Hoppe and Biological Leninism are not wrong and in that context Cathedral has explanatory power although only as on appendage growing out of Democracy and far less potent than it claims to.
How do you think this relates to intelligence? Mainstream is that it correlates both with leftism and low mutational load, which would cap the relation between the two.
How do you explain then how people will change their minds on issues, and how few are just born far-right and before then would have held left-wing or libertarian views?
A comment from someone who has nothing to do with genetic beyond high school textbook.
Although I understand that you are right about genetics there is some clarification required.
From what I understood. Is it possible that you are reducing an argument of incentive structure to one of genetics. Given Moldbug and Dawkins are wrong, yet Democracy the god that Failed by Hans-Herman Hoppe and Biological Leninism are not wrong and in that context Cathedral has explanatory power although only as on appendage growing out of Democracy and far less potent than it claims to.
How do you think this relates to intelligence? Mainstream is that it correlates both with leftism and low mutational load, which would cap the relation between the two.
Outside the topic: what do you prefer:FMA 2003 or FMA;B?